Two recent questions are published here (the name of the question sender is changed).
Question#1: In your article, you indicate that if an operator has an 80% rating that you multiply the cycle time by the rating (which reduces the cycle time for the operation). Wouldn’t you actually divide the cycle time by the rating to INCREASE the cycle time for the operation before you add the other allowances? … asked by Rick
I replied to Rick and I had a discussion with him to clarify the confusion over whether to multiply or divide the rating% to cycle time to calculate basic time. Read the following discussion with Rick, if you have the same question.
OCS: Hi Rick, the Rating factor is used to normalizing the cycle time. 100% rated the operator’s time considered as normal time (basic time). So, if an operator is working at 80% she is actually doing work at a slower pace compared to a 100% standard operator. That’s why she is taking a longer time than the 100% performer. Secondly, the normal time to do the job is less than the time taken by her (80% rate). That is why the rating factor is multiplied by the cycle time instead of dividing. I hope you understand my point.
Rick: Thank you for responding. Yes, I believe I understand what you are saying, however, I still believe that you need to divide the standard cycle time by the operator rating.
OCS: Rick, you are not following the purpose of the application of Rating. The purpose is to normalize the cycle time or make the equivalent to a 100% rated operator. Here cycle time is observed time. The purpose is to not increase or lowering cycle time.
I hope I am able to clarify this to you too.
Check out more about the performance rating in this article by Dr. Prabir Jana.
Leave a Reply